That's it, let it all out...

Is it pathetic that I'm pissed off because someone's pre-determined what I'm to have for tea when I had something else in mind? Or is it more pathetic to cry when someone tells you that you shouldn't have made something when my whole argument prior was that there was no space to do such a thing?

When I complained that there was "nothing in" for tea, and elaborated that my brother was using the cooking apparatus AND using the last of the chips (the only thing left to compliment the mountains of Birdseye beef in the freezer), one person translated that as "Make way for the tea I was complaining I couldn't have, no matter how illogical and impractical this may be."

You do not cook frozen burgers on the same cramped grill as you are cooking fresh turkey. You do not share one serving of chips between two people. You do not cook them both at the same time. Quite frankly, the idea's bullshit. If you think this is feasible, you're a moron. Go fuck yourself.

Then again, I guess when you think you're never wrong and someone contradicts you to the point where you can't possibly be right, then perhaps it could be acceptable to cry. After all, it's not like you have to eat that shit.